There is also the fact from your examples that the Clerestory roof makes a big difference, these were added to help with ventilation and lighting.Obviously, I'm still dealing with the proper scale of coaches build in different eras. To me, the smaller Jackson & Sharp coach was built directly after the American Civil War when five foot nine-inch man was considered large. This as opposed to the later coaches with closed vestibules that were built a generation after the Civil War when people were eating better and growing larger. At least that my logic for the variance in coach sizes. Whether true or not is only my guess.




Both have clerestories of different heights - that's where the main difference appears to lie.There is also the fact from your examples that the Clerestory roof makes a big difference, these were added to help with ventilation and lighting.
The windows on these coaches slid upwards to open ............. which wasn't very far. This is because below the swage line, behind the boarding, the body of the coach was constructed like a warren girder truss - which is why they don't sag like the Cambletown and Macrihanish Railway carriages didI notice the 'swage line' in the original photo appears to be almost the same for both carriages, strange that the lower roof coach apparently has taller windows.
Almost certainly, even relatively recently. For instance if I try to get into a 1950s European car I may just squeeze in but there is no way I could drive it in the position I would have to take. The same is also true of houses where the further back you go the smaller (especially ceiling height) they are, I once had a 200 year old house and a seemingly permanent sore head - not from beer before the wags start.I wondered if railroad car makers would have built smaller (shorter in height) railroad cars to accommodate smaller people from such a previous era?



Quick comparison - 1st is a picture is of the interior of a replica J&S car that runs on the 3ft gauge Cumbres & Toltec, former D&RGW, line. I understand theirs are mostly built on former flat car underframes. So overall size unknown compared to originals, but they will be shorter by virtue of their underfame origins (is this where the CMP issues started ?) But they do have restored J&S cars, no people for scale but article here https://www.trains.com/trn/news-rev...ailroad-restores-19th-century-passenger-cars/
2nd is a similar shot of the interior of a modern Welsh Highland Railway coach that runs on the 20 mile long 2ft gauge line in north Wales. This line has possibly the most generous loading gauge of all UK NG lines, irrespective of track gauge. Their, articulated, Garratt locos measure 8ft across the cylinders, they also use a 2-8-2 non-articulated tender loco on their line (All locos ex' South African Railways).
True, humans in our parts of the world have grown taller, over a number of generations, due to the growing greater abundance of nutritious food to the wider (no pun intended) masses. I live in a house that was built in 1720. I need to be careful in a couple of places not to clip the top of my 6ft frame. Looking at the irregular shape of some of my upper floors and doorframes they have been their a while and not made to meet the needs of loftier folk
C&T J&S replica car interior. Remember you have a clerestory giving the impression of greater size.
View attachment 350931
WHL modern saloon interior. Note, some Welsh people can be smaller than visiting tourists for scale. (Now I am really in trouble)
View attachment 350932
Gnome sweet gnome. It started life in 1720. The ground floor lies 9" below tge level of the pavement. And it stopped being a Antique Shop 26 years ago. The SMART car outside in now a newer 453 white one (2016 vintage)
View attachment 350933
Nearly all railway modelling is a compromise, in real 1:1 land railways took up acres of space. Apparently an 00 model of Kings Cross in it's entirety would cover at least a couple of tennis courts. So making rolling stock shorter means that shorter platforms etc look about rightThank you one and all for your comments on this subject of scale.
Maxi-Model's example of model train manufactures scaling their models shorter to negotiate model railroads tighter corners is valid. To some extent, I believe this also applies to real world smaller railroads. The two foot gauge railroad in New England is one example. In terms of length, Maxi-Model's example of a local railroad in Devon is clearly valid. However, it terms of height, many of the older buildings in that area, particularly along the coast had doorways and ceiling heights that were suited for smaller, shorter people. For the same reason, I wondered if railroad car makers would have built smaller (shorter in height) railroad cars to accommodate smaller people from such a previous era?
Oh missed the shorter one with a clerestory, do do that I am!Both have clerestories of different heights - that's where the main difference appears to lie.
Nearly all railway modelling is a compromise, in real 1:1 land railways took up acres of space. Apparently an 00 model of Kings Cross in it's entirety would cover at least a couple of tennis courts. So making rolling stock shorter means that shorter platforms etc look about right
Just give Brunel Models a call...I want one and I want one now ! A mate of mine is a Buckingham town councillor, I wonder if I can get him to hand the municipal tennis court to me ? Max
So, that will be 8 tennis courts then. MaxJust give Brunel Models a call...
PhilP.
Thank you Maxi-Model for the additional resources.
I wonder if the coaches in Knotts Berry Farm are rebuilt to original dimensions? It's been decades since I'd been there and don't really remember the height of the doors. The C-19 locomotive is the sister engine of D&RGW 346
View attachment 350940


I think you have a slightly beefier speaker than I have in mineThis Wikipedia article lays out points about the Knott's Berry Farm railroad. The loco's are the real deal. A couple of the J&S cars are certainly the real deal, like the locos ex' RGS, but I am not sure if they are in "revenue earning" service. Other cars seem to be converted from gondolas, which in turn use flat cars as their basis. Personally I like "prototypical" representations. But then my understanding of what is "prototypical" is limited, like my knowledge. As they say in this hobby, "There is s a prototype for everything". Oh, and they have RGS goose #3. What is not to like ? Max
2 genuine ex'RGS J&S cars at Knott's Berry Farm
View attachment 350961
My Goose #7 on the Bench receiving RC Trains singing dancing upgrade. Prop PhillP of this parish. (Anybody want to sell me a #5 ?)
View attachment 350962
I think you have a slightly beefier speaker than I have in mine![]()