It seems to be easy to take the valves out all the way. Thus cylinder ports will be all open. Moving the piston either way you should not feel much of resistance. If you experience compression instead, you have found the culprit.
Many thinks for your suggestions. They saved a lot of time and thought!Time for an air test with the reverser valve assembled, of course.
Next remove the rotary slider of the reverser valve. Blow air through each of the four passages.
With the safety out, there was no problem blowing all 4 - the boiler steam feed blow resulted in all the water in the boiler spraying out, fortunately on the towel. (A lot of white powder came out too - lime, I guess.) Blowing in to the cylinder exhaust vent sounded different from blowing in the steam feed, but it probably should.There should be no blockage, but one which is the lead from the boiler. Or the obstacle gets blown out.
Interesting statement - and true with the valves out. However, on my other locos (except Stanley, which is so worn it will roll downhill on the slightest slope,) they don't roll and you can usually feel a little compression as the pistons move backward and forward. Pushing this loco on the track does not show any resistance at all - pretty much like my Stanley!Moving the piston either way you should not feel much of resistance. If you experience compression
I don't think that's what is happening. When the motion stops, the other side piston is at full extension (fully forward or fully back.) You'd expect this piston to take up the motion as it is in the center - in fact, it should have been helping.The piston arrested midway ... does not sound like a leak
I did move the wheels with the valve chests empty. This loco rolls freely whatever state the valves are in.The piston test was intended with valve chests empty
Phil, your suggestions are always appreciated. However, if the powder was in a cylinder then 2 things: (1) the piston stopped in mid-stroke, not at the end, and (2) there would be some residue blown out of the stack/chimney and you'd see it - especially against a black loco.You said "white powder"
Well, here's surprise. All Teflon!So let's look at the piston.
There are no silly questions.Sorry if that's a silly question.
Yes, well, the Johnson Bar which I am more familiar with has a forward-neutral-reverse positioning. It's probablty US terminology. [I was a Brit once, so I am somewhat sensitive to these things.] Most 'neutral' positions stopped the loco dead in its tracks- my C-19 needed neutral on hills, as it just coasted if you shut the throttle and actually gained speed downhill! (Not this loco though.)refer to as "neutral" actually is "shut off"
I wonder if there is anywhere on the pistons that may take an ‘O’ ring or some packing? I think you have referred to this already. It certainly appears that the pistons are not doing any job in the bore. To work of course you need some compression for the steam to do its job and to my mind and I think you as well that is not occurring.There are no silly questions.
I checked that there was air coming from the cylinder when the piston was out - to confirm that both ends were getting air from the boiler via the valves and that there isn't a blockage.
It's pretty clear the pistons are not sealed in the cylinders, though if you read back a few posts, you'll find I noted that there are 4 exhaust events per revolution, so the valves are working. In my experience, if you push a steam engine with the gear in neutral, there will be some resistance as the pistons move. Not this engine! I also removed the rod and pushed the piston by hand, with no sign of resistance.
Well, that is certainly the next step.if there is anywhere on the pistons that may take an ‘O’ ring or some packing?
Phil, I am using steam oil. Now it has cooled down I will be checking the lubricator to see how much it used. My comments were that Regner seems to have special treacle oil, which I wasn't even aware of.I would definitely try the correct grade of steam oil,