Tony Walsham said:
Eventually it will become evident to most Large Scalers track power is a waste of time, effort and most importantly money. Battery power solves all the problems. I hear this lack of run time foible all the time.
I've read this thread with interest since I thought long and hard about converting to battery power before re-establishing my line (Ruritanian Railways) in 2007/8. I didn't, but I continue to dabble with battery power using a Cliff Barker system. I'm glad I didn't abandon track power: battery power, like live steam, is something I use for a specific purpose. For battery power, that's with small 4-wheel locos which have pick-up issues on any form of track power. For those, battery power is very handy indeed, but on the wider view it simply is not a like-for-like substitute for DCC track power. Battery power does not solve all problems. At least not yet - technology may well get there.
My problems with battery power - as found in real life running, rather than theory - can be summarised briefly:
1) Lack of available cells - even with LSD cells (I use Uniross Hybrio), I have found that it's rare to have a set of cells immediately available that have a full charge and can provide a decent running time. Typically, I need to give them 15-20 minutes charge. About as long as cleaning my track after a long absence from running....
2) Battery technology still isn't adequate. My locos typically draw over 2 amps each uphill and I need to double head with a reasonable train. I can't do that with battery power: I can only run "tiddlers" - a Stainz plus four LGB 300mm trucks. As Tony has pointed out, drawing over 1 amp reduces battery life too. Even with powerful 2600mAh NiMH cells, running time even for a "tiddler" is no more than 50 minutes. When I can run continuously for 3 hours with a full 6 coach train drawing 4.5 amps, I'll be ripe for conversion.
3) Battery power doesn't let me operate points or signals remotely (I use r/c DCC for that). So I have to have another system in addition to batteries and use two r/c controllers when running a train, not one.
4) Cost. Tony and others have produced marvellous systems, but for a reasonable layout with multiple locos and/or multiple trains running at once you will need numerous receivers, battery packs and chargers. When I did the maths, the projected costs of battery power on a like-for-like basis (one loco; one receiver+batteries) were noticeably higher than DCC. On a small layout, I could see battery power being adequate, though it still won't cover point and signal control.