Decisions
I had to make a number of decisions before I started building South Cerney Garden Railway and will go through the thought process in case it helps anyone in a similar position.
Taking these in no particular order:
Layout Inspiration
This was an easy one for me, I wanted to base my layout on our local village railway station that closed in 1963, our village trust has a website with details and a track plan which I wanted to recreate if possible:
South Cerney Station
As can be seen I have managed to recreate the track plan although have had to compress all of the lengths due to space constraints:
View attachment 271698
Gauge and Scale
As a youngster I had a large Hornby OO layout and recently unpacked it which got me thinking again about a garden railway. I initially considered O Gauge given the wide availability of British ready to run rolling stock. I bought the June 2020 edition of Hornby Magazine which featured a large O Gauge layout and the Heljan Class 50, it looked great but was very expensive. I then considered G Gauge which seemed to fit in better with garden planting and did not appear to take up any more space, but most importantly it seemed to be a lot cheaper!
Motive Power
Although live steam would have been my first choice I could not justify the expense. I was also a little concerned about the problems with keeping the track clean for regular DC powered locos although this does seem much improved with DCC. I was hoping to start with a couple of cheap starter sets and upgrading these to DCC again was looking pricey. I was intrigued about battery powered RC but there did not seem to be many options at my price point. I then came across the new PIKO Roncalli Starter Set which seemed ideal but was not yet available.
Track
I did briefly consider going with plastic track as it would have been much cheaper but there was a very limited range with only one radius of curve and points. I was also concerned about longevity and reduced options for running, but the main factor was resale cost. Brass track seems to retain its value well which cannot be said for plastic track and so the extra initial outlay seemed to be justified. In the UK the choice was then LGB or PIKO, I looked closely at both, the pricing is very similar but I decided on PIKO as the track geometry seemed simpler using a carefully thought out approach which made the design simpler, at least for me, although I have had to resort to Pythagorus and use Sin tables to work out some of the measurements, nice to know my school mathematics wasn’t wasted!