Curved bridges are not really prototypical, as they are almost impossible in pure engineering terms. The weight at the extremity of the arc causes too much turning moment.
As has been said, they really only work with intermediate supports, thus you have, in effect, two or more bridges.
If you look at 1:1 prototype brides with curved track, they are frequently built as wide, flat bridges with straight edges and the track curving across the deck from one side to the other.
Again, putting a support in the middle of a pond can have practical issues in our scale.
My 8ft bridge is built using 2 x Aluminium T-pieces of 50mm depth - as @maxi-model principle, but by using two sections with the leg of the 'T' under each rail, you can reduce the depth of the 'under-girder'. However, on a curve this will be trickier.
For any pillar, you need to think about the base first.
Presumably the pond is already in situ, and therefor wet

How is the pond built? Fibreglass or pond-liner? Whatever you do, you need to ensure that there is no punching effect on the liner, so whatever you use as a base for the pillar needs to be bedded on the liner. Easier said than done, but there are some compounds which can cure under water ............. but probably not cheap.
I'd be tempted to pre-fab the pillar, possibly from Aluminium RHS (Rectangular Hollow Section) and mount a flat plate on the bottom that can be bedded on the pond liner.