Hi Curtis,
I like your plans. My only suggestion, especially since you've found a little more space, is to lengthen your passing sidings a bit. They appear to be the ultimate limit on your train length. It is very difficult to lengthen them later should you wish to. I've got one passing siding on my RR that is shorter than I'd like even though it looked OK when I put it in. I wish I'd made it one LGB 10600 (60cm) longer after running a while. I can't fix it now without major rework that I'm not willing to do.
I think this point ties in nicely with what Greg says further down the thread so perhaps can give a general reply. One thing I think, upon reflection of the above plan, is I've maybe tried to do too much in the space. Generally, I think I achieved it well but at the expense of the length of stations/passing sides. Generally, I aimed for x3 HSB passenger coaches + loco, however, I think as part of the redraw I'm going to aim for x4 HSB passenger coaches + loco (which I think fits to your +60cm desire)
I'm not dogmatic with my railway and probably won't be for a while. I really embrace rule 8. The general guidelines are European steam in the DACH region and almost entirely narrow gauge locos and stock. I know my wife (as an American) would like to periodically run a
special American steam train and stock but let's consider that an exception. I know I'm not going to run any of the modern RhB or American stock (as beautiful as it is)
Edit added: One other suggestion - It appears your plan is likely based on sectional track. I recommend you go with flex track wherever possible even if you need to cut it to fit. You will not regret it! You'll be able to buy a rail bender for what you save on rail clamps! Plus, it'll lessen future issues with your intended track power.
You're right, a lot of what I bought was sectional primarily for my convenience of planning (and the ability to
play depending on how long this takes). I did also purchase 18m of flex track so there is some nice flexibility there (pun not intended)
Starting out, minimum radius and maximum grade.
To be successful, and be happy with your work a few years later, it's always best to identify the FUTURE of the layout.
When complete (say 5 years), what are the lengths and composition of the rolling stock? (longest cars, number of cars in a train)
Get even more specific on the locomotives you WANT to have.
With the room you have, you should (in my opinion) have NO R1 curves nor switches anywhere. The first thing that glares at me is your mostly underground R1 loop (since no scale was given to the grid, if I missed it let me know).
Setting your expectations will avoid no-fixable problems in the future.
Greg
Good spot, Greg. It's not LGB R1 but Piko R3 (~6ft diameter) and was a last addition to the plan. I decided against it for the reasons you outlined above and felt it was a "easy" way out that would likely bite me in the arse at some point.
Regarding R1s - I've got ~11 of both left and right R3 turnouts so was designing with minimal R1 turnouts in mind. I will use R1 turnouts in the storage sidings in the garage due to the space. I know this
may limit me in the future if I decide to massively change my fleet but I don't see that happening in the next 5 years. The only other place I considered them was in a redesign in reversing section in the terminus station on the left of the garage. Nikki agreed to extend the garage into our driveway giving us more space. Junction mockups below - layout is towards the top of the image. The rest of the terminus and the layout would be R3s.