Was this an expensive impulsive buy that I can't use or.....

Chris Vernell said:
Were they not intended to run cab first, as in the pic, thus 2-4-0?
Click to expand...
Yes very debatable but the chimney defines the front and yes there were turntables so that they could effectively work bunker first for most journeys. Surprising that most Tank engines did not employ this mode of operation meaning that the driver did not have a socking great boiler in front of his nose. The USA Cab Forwards sorted this to a dehree.
 
As the GVR was classed as a tramway the driver was required to be at the front of the locomotive, hence running cab first. A requirement conveniently forgotten when no 4 arrived.
 
dunnyrail said:
Yes very debatable but the chimney defines the front and yes there were turntables so that they could effectively work bunker first for most journeys. Surprising that most Tank engines did not employ this mode of operation meaning that the driver did not have a socking great boiler in front of his nose.
Click to expand...
Maybe they found the boiler a nicer view than the bunker
 
The chassis looks like an Essel Engineering product. They have a good reputation.

1764175820563.png

Your photo of the underside shows the wires from the charging socket going in to the side tank - an obvious place to hide the batteries.
I wouldn't try charging until you know what kind of batteries.

I suspect that the 4 Philips screws visible underneath in the corners will separate body from chassis. Nothing ventured, nothing gained!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom