sir haydn said:Again Mel, Brilliant!
Hows the transfer yard....I mean seating area coming on?
yb281 said:War Dept. wagons now completed. Here they are with Hank the Yank, although one of the vans is missing as I need to get another Hartland chassis (I've made 4 vans and a brake).
In military fashion, the vans are designated as being GPV (general purpose van), while the brake is B/PC (brake / personnel carrier). The reason for this is that, during the war, the brake was fitted with benches to allow up to 8 airmen to be carried. When loads were being trans-shipped, 4 would assist with the loading and 4 would form an armed guard in case of fifth columnists.
And shouldn't the B/PC be a Brakevan, Airman, for the use of....whatlep said:yb281 said:War Dept. wagons now completed. Here they are with Hank the Yank, although one of the vans is missing as I need to get another Hartland chassis (I've made 4 vans and a brake).
In military fashion, the vans are designated as being GPV (general purpose van), while the brake is B/PC (brake / personnel carrier). The reason for this is that, during the war, the brake was fitted with benches to allow up to 8 airmen to be carried. When loads were being trans-shipped, 4 would assist with the loading and 4 would form an armed guard in case of fifth columnists.
Lovely stuff Mel.![]()
Shouldn't the GPVs really be VMUs (Van - multiple use)?![]()
Or maybe;Gizzy said:And shouldn't the B/PC be a Brakevan, Airman, for the use of....whatlep said:yb281 said:War Dept. wagons now completed. Here they are with Hank the Yank, although one of the vans is missing as I need to get another Hartland chassis (I've made 4 vans and a brake).
In military fashion, the vans are designated as being GPV (general purpose van), while the brake is B/PC (brake / personnel carrier). The reason for this is that, during the war, the brake was fitted with benches to allow up to 8 airmen to be carried. When loads were being trans-shipped, 4 would assist with the loading and 4 would form an armed guard in case of fifth columnists.
Lovely stuff Mel.![]()
Shouldn't the GPVs really be VMUs (Van - multiple use)?![]()
Cheers Paul. Keep an eye out for Garden Rail issue 210.Stainzmeister said:Mm...great line Mel, character just gets better. NG heaven
yb281 said:Thanks again Mike, James and Richie.
A big decision has been taken recently - the WGLR is going completely over to battery power.
yb281 said:Thanks again Mike, James and Richie.
A big decision has been taken recently - the WGLR is going completely over to battery power. Track power will still be available for visiting loco's, but the home fleet will be 100% battery. I had come to the point where I really thought I needed to either go digital if I was going to stick with track power, or go down the battery route. I have now sold all of the chips from my locos and this sale will fund complete battery conversion, the self financing aspect being a strong motivation in making this decision.
At the moment the plan is for the Corpet and Spreewald to have self contained radio control with Li-Po batteries. Not sure what will happen to the Bachmann Baldwin until I get the chance to take it apart (after Chrissie). All the remaining locos will run with battery RC in trailing vans. All the RC kit will be from Cliff Barker of course.
Yes I can see that 'normal' RC is the best solution for you.yb281 said:I think that battery propulsion with digital control is probably the way forward, but I'm not sure that Revolution is the answer as things stand, certainly not for me.