Today on the WGLR

love it mell.. ingeniuse use off the chassieys too:thumbup:
 
Nice ones Mel....
 
Terrific stuff Mel :thumbup:
 
Nice pics Mel, post 495 the last pic looks brilliant love the buildings :thumbup:
 
sir haydn said:
Again Mel, Brilliant!

Hows the transfer yard....I mean seating area coming on?

Veeeeeerrrry slowly I'm afraid mate. I'm a bit of a whimp weather wise and very easily distracted at this time of the year. :bigsmile:

Tony, funnily enough I have got a model of a Bofors gun. It's the wrong scale, but ..................... :thinking::thinking: :bigsmile::bigsmile:
 
yb281 said:
War Dept. wagons now completed. Here they are with Hank the Yank, although one of the vans is missing as I need to get another Hartland chassis (I've made 4 vans and a brake).
In military fashion, the vans are designated as being GPV (general purpose van), while the brake is B/PC (brake / personnel carrier). The reason for this is that, during the war, the brake was fitted with benches to allow up to 8 airmen to be carried. When loads were being trans-shipped, 4 would assist with the loading and 4 would form an armed guard in case of fifth columnists.

Lovely stuff Mel. :thumbup:
Shouldn't the GPVs really be VMUs (Van - multiple use)? :bigsmile:
 
whatlep said:
yb281 said:
War Dept. wagons now completed. Here they are with Hank the Yank, although one of the vans is missing as I need to get another Hartland chassis (I've made 4 vans and a brake).
In military fashion, the vans are designated as being GPV (general purpose van), while the brake is B/PC (brake / personnel carrier). The reason for this is that, during the war, the brake was fitted with benches to allow up to 8 airmen to be carried. When loads were being trans-shipped, 4 would assist with the loading and 4 would form an armed guard in case of fifth columnists.

Lovely stuff Mel. :thumbup:
Shouldn't the GPVs really be VMUs (Van - multiple use)? :bigsmile:
And shouldn't the B/PC be a Brakevan, Airman, for the use of....
 
Gizzy said:
whatlep said:
yb281 said:
War Dept. wagons now completed. Here they are with Hank the Yank, although one of the vans is missing as I need to get another Hartland chassis (I've made 4 vans and a brake).
In military fashion, the vans are designated as being GPV (general purpose van), while the brake is B/PC (brake / personnel carrier). The reason for this is that, during the war, the brake was fitted with benches to allow up to 8 airmen to be carried. When loads were being trans-shipped, 4 would assist with the loading and 4 would form an armed guard in case of fifth columnists.

Lovely stuff Mel. :thumbup:
Shouldn't the GPVs really be VMUs (Van - multiple use)? :bigsmile:
And shouldn't the B/PC be a Brakevan, Airman, for the use of....
Or maybe;
Brake
Railway
Airman
That way it could hold a couple of bouncing bombs? :bigsmile:
 
Fantastic Mel. Your 'little bit of Britain' line is really inspiring and evocative. Hats off to your modelling skills mate.

As to wimpy reaction to weather...I only play golf when it is dry...no cold wet days. Just been out clearing leaves and that is enough for me!
 
Great pic's Mel do like your WD train:bigsmile:
 
Thanks again Mike, James and Richie.

A big decision has been taken recently - the WGLR is going completely over to battery power. Track power will still be available for visiting loco's, but the home fleet will be 100% battery. I had come to the point where I really thought I needed to either go digital if I was going to stick with track power, or go down the battery route. I have now sold all of the chips from my locos and this sale will fund complete battery conversion, the self financing aspect being a strong motivation in making this decision.

At the moment the plan is for the Corpet and Spreewald to have self contained radio control with Li-Po batteries. Not sure what will happen to the Bachmann Baldwin until I get the chance to take it apart (after Chrissie). All the remaining locos will run with battery RC in trailing vans. All the RC kit will be from Cliff Barker of course.
 
yb281 said:
Thanks again Mike, James and Richie.

A big decision has been taken recently - the WGLR is going completely over to battery power.

The Wetton Gooey Lightly Battered Railway :bigsmile::bigsmile::bigsmile:
 
yb281 said:
Thanks again Mike, James and Richie.

A big decision has been taken recently - the WGLR is going completely over to battery power. Track power will still be available for visiting loco's, but the home fleet will be 100% battery. I had come to the point where I really thought I needed to either go digital if I was going to stick with track power, or go down the battery route. I have now sold all of the chips from my locos and this sale will fund complete battery conversion, the self financing aspect being a strong motivation in making this decision.

At the moment the plan is for the Corpet and Spreewald to have self contained radio control with Li-Po batteries. Not sure what will happen to the Bachmann Baldwin until I get the chance to take it apart (after Chrissie). All the remaining locos will run with battery RC in trailing vans. All the RC kit will be from Cliff Barker of course.

Have you considered the Aristocraft Revolution option, Mel?
I saw it put through its paces at Tony's and was mightily impressed. You have a handset that is about the size of the mobile phones that were about a few years back (not the original ones!) and a single chip for each loco. It has an LCD screen with info much like on a Massoth navigator. The workings are also very much like DCC but are not DCC.
Each loco has an address and running parameters and functions (like sound, lights and smoke) that can be easily set up for each loco. The chip that you put in the loco will work off either track or battery and is pretty small and has a short little wire aerial. It can connect easily to sound cards, smoke boards or lighting.
I wanted to have a couple or three of battery locos for when I did not want to clean the track during the winter and have got hold of a handset and three chips. The ease of use,the flexibility and the ability for one controller to be able to operate up to 50 individual locos (as if I would need that !) made me go for the Revolution solution. It is also dead easy to set up locos to work on consists or lash-ups if needed.
 
Yes Mike I have looked at the Revolution. The main reason for not going down that route is the cost of buying the kit and then having to buy chips for each loco. I also do not like the lack of compatibility with other systems. One member of our GSS uses it on his US outline railway with track power and, to be honest, I'm not impressed. His track has to be absolutely immaculately clean even for his big US locos with loads of pick-ups, the polar opposite of my little 0-4-0's. Also, no-one else takes any of their trains to run at his open days, because they're not compatible. Obviously, battery power with the Revolution would get around this, but you've still got the cost of chips ON TOP of the price of batteries.

To put Cliff Barker battery RC in a wagon costs just under £150, but then to convert a loco to run with that wagon only costs 75P or £1.50 if I want leads on both ends. Sound, smoke, lights etc. are all possible, but to be honest reliable slow running is the priority for me (I only had one sound fitted loco anyway).

I think that battery propulsion with digital control is probably the way forward, but I'm not sure that Revolution is the answer as things stand, certainly not for me.
 
Massoth will eventually bring out a radio module that plugs into their DCC chips allowing them to be controlleddirectly by one of the wireless Massoth handsets, ie doing without the main control box. Should work with battery power as well as track, as the DCC signal is sent via radio rather than through the track
 
yb281 said:
I think that battery propulsion with digital control is probably the way forward, but I'm not sure that Revolution is the answer as things stand, certainly not for me.
Yes I can see that 'normal' RC is the best solution for you.
The Revolution chip does need the capacitor board add on to be fine using tack power on dirty track, or even partially dirty or even for any drop out....a bit like DCC can be ......

My reason for suggesting it is partially due to the fact that I got the brand new handset plus three chips for a couple of notes so it sort of makes sense for what I want to do. Also I saw Tony's locos runnig with battery and they were superb.
I will not use the Revos for track power as I have TE ordinaire at present and will.....drift to the dark side for part of the layout. But DCC needs good track too so I wonder what will show?
 
Back
Top Bottom