Points on an incline

Eaglecliff

Eaglecliff

Registered
Country flag
I ought to be able to work this out by trial and error, but any thoughts would be welcome; should points be laid on the flat part-way up an incline? I’m having trouble with larger locos struggling where they meet a downhill point just before the end of the incline. Should I move the point along to the flat?
If the point were to be half-way up the incline, does it make a difference whether the divergence or convergence is downhill or uphill?
PS I did read a similar thread from 2012 but it seemed a bit brief.
 
Not quite sure I understand the problem, are you saying that the point in someway causes the loco to struggle when it passes over it?
 
Seeing as how you are going downhill, and round a curve, as you diverge.. I am guessing you get a twisting 'moment' (is that the correct word?), as the curve will not be flat..

I believe it is normal for points on switchback rails to be on the level..?? My 'gut' says points should be on the level.. :nerd::nod::nod:
 
As all railway's prefer straight and flat runs, anything different to that can cause problems, even slightly tight bends, so a point on an incline doesn't really bode well.
 
I have a point on a 1:40 incline, used in both directions. It also has the main line on the curve, the stockyard is off it. The main thing is making sure that the whole thing is level across ways.
 
Everyone seems to agree that level side-to-side, i.e. no superelevation, is vital. I’ll be looking again at the location of the point, as well as checking the point itself, and the ballast may be a bit “soft,” which won’t help. Fortunately if the problem won’t go away, I have the option to relocate the point to a flat area. The problem loco, although I haven’t checked the others, is the prima donna pictured left...
 
Eaglecliff said:
Everyone seems to agree that level side-to-side, i.e. no superelevation, is vital. I’ll be looking again at the location of the point, as well as checking the point itself, and the ballast may be a bit “soft,” which won’t help. Fortunately if the problem won’t go away, I have the option to relocate the point to a flat area. The problem loco, although I haven’t checked the others, is the prima donna pictured left...
Click to expand...

Did you forget something?
 
The full point needs to be level but not necessarily flat (as in no grade) including the track either side of it.. Putting the entire unit on a continuous grade should not be a problem unless it is very steep. I have 2 on about 1:50 grades.
 
PhilP said:
Think he is referring to his 'Avatar' picture??

Does said loco have any suspension, or is it quite rigid?

<edit> Does cowcatcher, err catch? Is it the front pony-truck giving problems??
Click to expand...
The front axle has a bit of 3-dimensional movement, the rear two only sideplay. The bogie has 3-d movement, but you probably wouldn’t describe it as sloppy. The cowcatcher is long with plenty of overhang even on R3 curves and close to the ground so it might conceivably catch on ballast at the spot in question; it certainly does elsewhere where I obviouly haven’t yet flattened down some new grit properly. Unfortunately, geometry and lack of available space conspire to prevent the grade to be reduced, much as I would like to. For practical purposes two Jackson Sharps, with some pickups bent away from the wheels, is the limit at the critical point where the incline includes a reverse curve. No doubt many heads will be shaken at that.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom