How to slow a loco that is a LOT faster than all my others. Electronics experts help please!

ThomasDadDurham

Really Useful Engine
Country flag
Im wanting my passing loops to use analogue automation, using RRConcepts Stationmaster system. The issue here is that two of my 5 locos are over twice as fast, if not three times as fast, as all the others (Diesel and Toby). They're all cleaned, and Ive asked other owners of the Thomas Large Scale Range and the consensus is - they are all radically different. That aligns with my opening them up. Same motors, but very different gearing, and age is also likely a factor with all of mine being 2nd hand, bar Diesel and Percy).

The alternating trains setups needs them roughly the same speed. At present, enough power to get James or Thomas up my incline with a train, means Toby or Diesel races round so fast they fly off on the first corner.

Ive been told 'add a string of diodes' as each diode gives a slight voltage drop. But I dread spending days soldering and unsoldering to try and dial in Diesel and Tobys speeds to match James/Thomas/Percy.

My question is, cant I add some sort of adjustable thing, some sort of speed controller, to the loco? Its confusing me because that would be like a second speed controller in line with the first (my controls are Gaugemaster GMC-10LGB's, fitted with PWM to Linear Converters from GScale Graphics as it was recommended to protect my locos which have soundcards.) and electronically, I have no idea what issues that would cause??

(Before the cries of 'go DCC', I really dont want to switch to DCC, because even then, I cant simply do 'alternating trains on a station stop passing loop', short of it seems, a degree in programming and making completely bespoke circuits. I just want an off-the-shelf solution hence the Stationmaster.)
 
Not sure but a DC - DC voltage buck ? Would put a top stop on the voltage a motor can receive and cap the loco's top speed. And they are easy to adjust so you get a desired voltage regulated speed cap. It would not slow how fast it got there though.

LGB used something on their track cleaning loco to slow it independent of the track power, used to rotate the cleaning heads at speed. I have seen some simple and cheap manual speed controllers that might do the job if interposed between motor and power supply. Something like this ESC-180 Max

EDIT - From what has been said by PhilliP neither of these are options as they cannot deal with polarity reversals. Oh well, back to the drawing board.
 
Last edited:
I can't help you with the speed issue, but Curtis Roecks, the inventor/maker of RRconcepts Stationmaster, was extremely helpful when I was setting up my garden railway 35 years ago. I don't employ the Stationmaster since I converted to batter power about 15 years ago. I still have a handful of Stationmasters in my workshop.
 
All the speed controllers are going to be polarity sensitive, so fine if going forwards. - Many would release the magic-smoke if the controller was changed to reverse!

The diode string works in both directions, is quite simple, but you will need to set the speed control to the same setting each time. - There will not be a constant relationship in speed between different settings of the controller between the different models.

PhilP.
 
I can't help you with the speed issue, but Curtis Roecks, the inventor/maker of RRconcepts Stationmaster, was extremely helpful when I was setting up my garden railway 35 years ago. I don't employ the Stationmaster since I converted to batter power about 15 years ago. I still have a handful of Stationmasters in my workshop.
Yes it was Curtis who offered the 'string of diodes' solution.


The speed difference is -extreme-. To get James pulling three coaches around, without stalling, I set the controller to say, 60-70 (GMC-10LGBs go from 0-100). If I then have him sharing the track with Diesel or Toby, at 60 they will shoot off like a bullet and bolt straight off the first corner they reach (Tobys roof is now chipped thanks to this), those two need to be set to 20-25 to go round at the same sort of speed - pulling a similar weight of train.

It means Toby and Diesel must always be paired on one track, and the other three are all close enough in speed to share a track. But my kids dont grasp this and demand to have whichever trains on whatever track they want, so I have to stand at the controls the whole time we play.

A device that would 'cap' the max speed and be adjustable so each train can be set differently would work - I'll need proper confirmation/second opinion that the 'buck converter' would work / wont cause complications?
--------------------------------------------
[...]The diode string works in both directions, is quite simple, but you will need to set the speed control to the same setting each time. - There will not be a constant relationship in speed between different settings of the controller between the different models.
[...]
The main controller on a alternating trains Stationmaster setup should stay fixed. The only reason I have to keep changing it at the moment is to stop fast trains flying off and slow trains stalling. I gathered I'd have to painstakingly adjust each and every train, adding a diode at a time, using the slowest in my collection as the baseline - this is what I was hoping to avoid (for time). I didnt think diodes would make them all the same speed on different settings of the main controller, if thats what you were getting at?

I just have absolutely zero time to fanny on with these things with two young boys. Its been a year and I STILL havent added the mylocosound cards to my trains, Ive only found time for one bit of soldering and that was a dud motor replacement!
 
Do you have a meter, so you can measure the voltage on the track?

Set a loco running, at the speed you want it. Then measure the voltage on the track.

Do this for all your loco's. You will then have an idea of how much you need to reduce the voltage by, in the loco's that are too fast.

Each diode in the 'string' will reduce the voltage by about 0.6V. So you can get the 'string' about right to start with.

Until you know the sort of voltage you need to reduce by, you can't decide if this is a viable solution for you.

PhilP.
 
Use the series diode method..... if you need more detail on what to do, you will need to figure out what voltage you need on the track to get the speed of movement you want from each of the too fast locos, then report back here.

Aldo, the voltage on the track when your LGB locos are running speed of movement you want from them.

For example only:
LGB locos - 8V
Non LGB loco A - 4V
Non LGB loco B -3.5V
 
Last edited:
I have had some success providing manual control of my locos using a 12V 'speed controller'. [There are 10-60VDC versions too.] I suspect you could add one of these and adjust the speed to set the maximum where you want it. Then control it from your usual layout controller.


View attachment 348975


These are less than $2 from Aliexpress.
https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256806406116140.html
THESE ALL REQUIRE THE POLARITY OF THE INPUT TO ALWAYS BE CORRECT!

THIS WILL END IN TEARS, IF ANYONE REVERSES THE TRACK POLARITY.

You will never be able to run the loco backwards.

Do we have penetration?
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

PhilP.
 
i am no specialist. but as i have no specialists near, i tried the string method out.
an LGB Stainz, that was much slower, than the LGB tender i wanted to use with it.
i cut one of the cables, that go to the motor of the tender, took two diodes (same type as in the reedcontacts from LGB)
twisted them side by side together, one forwards, one backwards and soldered them into the cable.
that was not enough, so i soldered another pair of diodes in series with the first pair.
since then the tender towing three short cars gains only 2" per round on a R1 circle. good enough for me.

(next time i have to do that, i will put shrink tube around the diodes)
 
THESE ALL REQUIRE THE POLARITY OF THE INPUT TO ALWAYS BE CORRECT!

THIS WILL END IN TEARS, IF ANYONE REVERSES THE TRACK POLARITY.

You will never be able to run the loco backwards.

Do we have penetration?
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

PhilP.

Got it, hence my edit erlier yesterday. If I could work out how to delete my post I would. I see why polarity reversal is an issue now. Ma
 
Not specifically aimed at anyone..
in that case not replying to anyone in special.

for about ten years i had my trains running automated with magnets, reeds and switch motors. simple DC. (LGB 5002, 50080 & selfmade from PC powerpacks and outdoor dialers)
as i did not like the short and brutal stops, i brained about the fact, that diodes use up some of the volts.
the result was this: pic one

dioden bild 1.jpg


as my powerpacks start moving the trains at about 5V, i had absorbed about half of the fullspeed velocity before the stop. one more slowdown step would have been nicer, but would have conflicted with the turnouts and the other trains.

that worked forwards, because in rewards the diodes blocked the electricity.
so i added some diodes in the opposite direction. pic 2

dioden bild 2.jpg

that gave me a nice, slow acceleration at reversing.
about ten years without smoke!

coming to the theme of this thread, when i had a tender, that was too quick for its loco, i thought it should be the same if the reeds were between controller and pick ups, or between pick ups and motor.

and, (maybe, because i had no specialists, to tell me, that it can't work) it worked during a lot of testing, again without undesired smoke pic three.

dioden bild 3.jpg

thewhole idea is, that thes pairs of diodes let electricity pass in both directions, but steal some electrons... :cool:
edit: maybe i should mention, that i used here the colour scheme of LBG - possibly blue and red mixed up.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom