A few shots taken during my most recent running session
I hope you enjoy them.
Rik
PS - Sometimes I turn on the soundcards, sometimes I don't. A lot depends on what the neighbours are doing (the sounds seem to upset their dogs).
Thanks Garry. I enjoyed making the video.Lovely, a pleasure to watch !
They do look Southwoldish - I was thinking that the other day as I watched a train chugging round - but they were actually based on Leek & Manifold coaches (albeit a bit shorter)Oh wow!
Those Southwoldish coaches are just fabulous - and I see that the 'down' ore train doesn't like the LGB R3 points any more than I do![]()
Yes, I'm 100% battery now. Haven't cleaned any track with a track rubber for over two years now.I assume that is all battery power - absolutely spanking![]()
They do look Southwoldish - I was thinking that the other day as I watched a train chugging round - but they were actually based on Leek & Manifold coaches (albeit a bit shorter)
Southwold likes to claim that it was England's only 3' gauge railway (there's a plaque on the site of Southwold Station stating this) but they seem to have forgotten that the Rye & Camber was 3' and that the Ravenglass & Eskdale was originally 3' before Bassett Lowke got his hands on it. Then, of course, some of the Ironstone railways in the Midlands were also 3' gauge, though I think at least one of them later became metre gauge.Yes, I realised the were based on L&M coaches, but it's the top lights that make them look Southwold -like - England's only 3 ft railway wasn't it?
I'd forgotten about Col Stephens' 3 footer at Rye, but the remains of my Ian Allan abc of Narrow Gauge Railways (of about 1961) gives the original Ratty as 2' - 9"
RatsThere's some dispute about the original gauge - eg see Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravenglass_and_Eskdale_Railway
There has been dispute about the gauge. It is shown as 3 feet in records but is quoted as 2 ft 9 in (838 mm) in some books such as the ABC of Narrow Gauge Railways.[5] This figure was believed for many years until the present company discovered a sleeper from before the line closed, with spacings between holes made by track spikes confirming the gauge was the wider one. The confusion probably stems from the fact that the line was built under the condition that it was "of a gauge not less than 2' 9" "
I think the general consensus now is it was 3'.
Rik