sigh...
here we go again.
everybody knows what did work or not work for themself - and thus does not recognise different circumstances.
---
if the connectivity of your track is ok, for a single line of track (your 100ft) you probably don't need a bus.
(it depends where you feed the electricity to the track. if you feed the track at the first foot of the 100 with a cable of 1' length, one or two mm thick, and add a bus of 101ft length (even if this bus is as thick as your thumb) to the other end of the track, you gain (almost) nothing - because inside the regulator the cables are thin too.
you would gain more power at the extremes, by connecting the regulator somewhere near the 50ft midpoint of the track.
(what i don't know, is if you need one or two buses for your two lines in DCC)
if the connectivity of your track is not ok:
if you feed the track at the first foot of the 100 with a cable of 1' length, one or two mm thick, and add a bus of 101ft length to the other end of the track, you got one disconnect free (because electricity reaches from both sides to the disconnected spot)
but starting with the second disconnected spot - you'll have to start mending things.
Mr Murphy will see to it, that things don't work, just when you want to show off...
that is why i suggested to squeeze cables under the rails.
(i swear on "make do" solutions)
View attachment 347231
to repeat myself, the best would be using rail-clamps before oxidation ore movements occur. depending on the lengths of track you got, you'll need one to two hundred.
the second best, IMO, would be to either solder the rails together, or the rails to the fishplates (if you can solder better, than i can)
View attachment 347232
ps: soapy water and a stiff brush work wonders.
in the early 80ies when i broke up my second layout (the only one, i had in the mud) track was treated that way.
and for my upcoming fifth layout only those with homemade connections will get that treatment again. (about a dozen from over 400ft)