Back to Backs

C

Cyclone

Registered
I've just adjusted some IP engineering wheels and axles. When I found that my track and wheel guage from Steve at Back to bay6 is 39mm for back to back (back of flange to opposite back)
But my IP wheel gauge is 40mm.

I've always thought for 45mm gauge the back to backs should be 40mm?

I run on mainly peco G45 with the occasional lgb bit of track and points thrown in.

I'm slightly confused.
 
Back to back is important with regard to clearances for check rails etc. and guidance through frogs, but you also have to consider the thickness of the flange and the thickness of the wheel tread. One single back to back measurement isn't necessarily correct if you have a mixture of wheel sizes and brands, and of course is worsened if you also mix brands of trackwork. Trial and error works best for me!
 
Back to back also varies a bit depending on the thickness of the flange
 
Back-to-backs, were a certain type of house in poor areas of some cities. No back door or garden, just another terrace house the other side of the wall.
;D ;D
 
On full size you measure in 3 places or the track checkers tell us the wheel profile, shape and sizes. While you have it upside down check all the wheels in at least two places. As mentioned the profile from one manufacturer to another might be different or even worn if old plus the rail it self can be different. :-X
 
bobg said:
Back-to-backs, were a certain type of house in poor areas of some cities. No back door or garden, just another terrace house the other side of the wall.
;D ;D
Click to expand...

Which explains, most likely, why garden railroading pre WW2 was not a widely practiced hobby then. ;)

Reading the thread reminded me of the problems encountered, on occasions, by the railways operate by the famous late Col. Holman Stephens when they transferred or sold, after closure, some stock to his other railways. Wheels, rail poundage and styles were quite varied it seems.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom