3-rail track power - why?

Mobi

Registered
Country flag
Lionel uses 3-rail track power in O-gauge trains.

Is there any advantage? I can see reverse loops are easier.
ChatGPT says 3-rail system is more reliable than 2-rail because current has more paths to complete circuit. Is that true in real life?

Also, O-gauge is typically used indoor. Do people with 3-rail run trains outdoor?

As a disadvantage, it must be costlier than 2-rail tracks as it uses more metal? In addition, these locos are incompatible with 2-rail tracks I believe.
 
Possibly an early manufacturing dictate. With a 3 rail system you do not need insulated wheelsets if your centre rail (3rd) is live and the running rails are the returns. Then cheaper and simpler to produce. UK's Hornby Dublo (OO) system, originated in the 1930's used 3 rail. Most 1:1 electric railways use rails only for return and a live 3rd rail or overhead wire for current. You could mix old steam locos with modern electrics on lines with mixed traction. Also a handy way to "lock" the buyer into your system, a marketing ploy. One that any manufacturer worth their salt ditched decades ago. Even those who make live steam locos (insulated wheels, that is) Max
 
Last edited:
Yep, as max has said, it dates from a good few years back, and mainly had its origins in metal locos and wagons/coaches - it made insulation a whole lot easier and allows for better current pickup, effectively doubling the number of current carrying wheels.
 
Then there is Stud contact, a continental manufacturer still uses it I think ‘Maerklin HO’? 3 rail and indeed stud does give you better reliability as there is a simple collection via skates and the return via track. Trix used to use the 3 rail system to allow 2 trains to be independently controlled, one using 1 rail, the ither with the centre third being common return.

On the real thing we have SR and others 3rd rail pickup which is cheeper to install than overhead though the Brighton's first iteration with electric power was indeed overhead that got converted to 3 rail!
 
Then there is Stud contact, a continental manufacturer still uses it I think ‘Maerklin HO’? 3 rail and indeed stud does give you better reliability as there is a simple collection via skates and the return via track. Trix used to use the 3 rail system to allow 2 trains to be independently controlled, one using 1 rail, the ither with the centre third being common return.

On the real thing we have SR and others 3rd rail pickup which is cheeper to install than overhead though the Brighton's first iteration with electric power was indeed overhead that got converted to 3 rail!
Yep, stud contact is a more aesthetically pleasing version of 3-rail, and I believe Peco still make a system for 16.5 mm gauge.
 
3 rail power systems for model railways date back to the start of mass produced "toys" when the range of materials available for electrical insulation was quite limited compared to more recent times. 2 rail power collection, which necessarily requires that the pair of wheels in a wheelset are electrically insulated from each other, was just not practical until after WW2 (which drove a huge amount of innovation is materials technology).
 
Or the four rails on the Underground
Just what you need when you build your railways, at the least the deep level ones', to travel through iron tubes. Adopted ultimately as the universal power transfer system, for even the "cut and cover" sub surface lines. There are stretches of the latter that shares their use with the more conventional 3 rail mainline stock. Max

From Wikipedia

The lines are electrified with a four-rail DC system. The configuration and potential of the conductor rails varies across the network. As of 2020, there are three different conductor rail configurations:

The original configuration is nominally 630 V with a −210 V centre conductor rail and a +420 V outside conductor rail. This is the default configuration wherever deep-level tube trains operate.[8]
Beginning in 2016, sections of the sub-surface network were reconfigured to a 750 V configuration (−250 V and +500 V rails). As of 2019, the entire sub-surface network uses this configuration except for Uxbridge to Finchley Road (via Harrow) as 1973 Stock and 1996 Stock (of the Piccadilly and Jubilee lines respectively) share the railway.[9]
In areas where Underground and third rail rolling stock share tracks, the centre conductor rail is electrically connected to the running rails. This still results in a 750 V voltage, but in a 0 V/+750 V configuration.[8] Lines configured in this manner include:
Between Gunnersbury and Richmond on the District line, shared with London Overground
Between East Putney and Wimbledon on a section of the District line that was transferred from British Rail
Between Queen's Park and Harrow & Wealdstone on the Watford DC line, served by Bakerloo line and London Overground trains
The four rail system was first used in the early 20th century. The isolated traction current return allowed a train's position to be detected using DC track circuits, and reduced any earth leakage currents that could affect service pipes, telephone cables, or cast iron tunnel liners.[10]

The traction current has no direct earth point, but there are two resistors connected in series across the traction supply. The positive resistor is twice as great as the negative resistor, since the positive rail carries twice the voltage of the negative rail. The junction point of the resistors is earthed, establishing the reference point between the positive and negative rails by voltage division. The resistors are great enough to prevent large currents flowing through the earthed infrastructure.
 
Just what you need when you build your railways, at the least the deep level ones', to travel through iron tubes. Adopted ultimately as the universal power transfer system, for even the "cut and cover" sub surface lines. There are stretches of the latter that shares their use with the more conventional 3 rail mainline stock. Max

From Wikipedia

The lines are electrified with a four-rail DC system. The configuration and potential of the conductor rails varies across the network. As of 2020, there are three different conductor rail configurations:

The original configuration is nominally 630 V with a −210 V centre conductor rail and a +420 V outside conductor rail. This is the default configuration wherever deep-level tube trains operate.[8]
Beginning in 2016, sections of the sub-surface network were reconfigured to a 750 V configuration (−250 V and +500 V rails). As of 2019, the entire sub-surface network uses this configuration except for Uxbridge to Finchley Road (via Harrow) as 1973 Stock and 1996 Stock (of the Piccadilly and Jubilee lines respectively) share the railway.[9]
In areas where Underground and third rail rolling stock share tracks, the centre conductor rail is electrically connected to the running rails. This still results in a 750 V voltage, but in a 0 V/+750 V configuration.[8] Lines configured in this manner include:
Between Gunnersbury and Richmond on the District line, shared with London Overground
Between East Putney and Wimbledon on a section of the District line that was transferred from British Rail
Between Queen's Park and Harrow & Wealdstone on the Watford DC line, served by Bakerloo line and London Overground trains
The four rail system was first used in the early 20th century. The isolated traction current return allowed a train's position to be detected using DC track circuits, and reduced any earth leakage currents that could affect service pipes, telephone cables, or cast iron tunnel liners.[10]

The traction current has no direct earth point, but there are two resistors connected in series across the traction supply. The positive resistor is twice as great as the negative resistor, since the positive rail carries twice the voltage of the negative rail. The junction point of the resistors is earthed, establishing the reference point between the positive and negative rails by voltage division. The resistors are great enough to prevent large currents flowing through the earthed infrastructure.
Yes, there was concern on the early tube lines about potential electrocution of passengers - also the use of steel tunnel sections and current jumping. All gets a bit above my pay grade really :emo:
 
Back
Top Bottom